Entertainment Bill Cosby Asking Supreme Court to Review Janice Dickinson Defamation Lawsuit

00:46  05 june  2018
00:46  05 june  2018 Source:   hollywoodreporter.com

Cosby accuser makes first public statements since trial

  Cosby accuser makes first public statements since trial The woman whose claims that Bill Cosby drugging and molesting her led to the comedian's conviction on sexual assault charges is speaking out in public for the first time. NBC's "Today" show on Thursday aired a brief taped segment of an interview with Andrea Constand. Constand discussed how she says Cosby knocked her out in 2004 with three blue pills he called "your friends." The full interview is due to air Friday night on the network's "Dateline" show.PHILADELPHIA — The woman whose claims that Bill Cosby drugging and molesting her led to the comedian's conviction on sexual assault charges is speaking out in public for the first time.

Bill Cosby wearing a suit and tie© Provided by The Hollywood Reporter

Bill Cosby has a lot of legal problems, and he is now preparing to ask the U.S. Supreme Court for review. But it's not over the comedian's sexual assault conviction in April. That case may eventually get to the high court, but for now, Cosby wants the justices to weigh in on a defamation lawsuit he's defending against former supermodel Janice Dickinson. On Friday, in an application for an extension, Cosby's lawyer told Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy of a coming petition for writ of certiorari.

Dickinson, who accuses Cosby of drugging and raping her in the 1980s, is suing over a press statement from Cosby's former attorney Marty Singer. As the Cosby scandal began heating up in 2014, Singer told media outlets that Dickinson's story was "fabricated and is an outrageous defamatory lie."

Bill Cosby Accuser Andrea Constand: "It Was Dr. Huxtable... Who's Going to Believe Me?"

  Bill Cosby Accuser Andrea Constand: In Friday's Dateline special "Bringing Down Bill Cosby: Andrea Constand Speaks," Constand sat down with Kate Snow to share her experience and why she decided to come forward.In the special, called "Bringing Down Bill Cosby: Andrea Constand Speaks," Constand, who met the actor and comedian after a Temple University basketball game 16 years ago, said she came forward with her story for justice. "This has never been about money.  This has been about justice.  I wasn't talking money.  I was talking police and justice," she said.

This past November, a California appeals court allowed Dickinson to move forward in her defamation lawsuit. In the decision, legally noteworthy for multiple reasons, California associate justice Laurence Rubin rejected Cosby's assertion that Singer's letter to media outlets merely conveyed opinion rather than provable facts.

"Cosby takes the position that the demand letter is not actionable as it is simply Singer’s opinion, based on fully disclosed facts," wrote Rubin. "We disagree. As we shall explain, nearly every factor of the totality of the circumstances test points strongly toward the conclusion that a reasonable fact finder could conclude the demand letter states or implies a provably false assertion of fact — specifically, that Cosby did not rape Dickinson, and she is lying when she says that he did."

Man charged with homicide after dismembered remains found

  Man charged with homicide after dismembered remains found A man has been charged with criminal homicide in connection with severed human remains found at a Pittsburgh home. Forty-two-year-old John Robert Dickinson also is charged in Allegheny County with abuse of a corpse, evidence-tampering and other crimes. The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reports police found evidence of a violent struggle at the home of 46-year-old Kevin Thompson and dismembered remains in a shed and basement. Court documents don't list an attorney representing Dickinson.Forty-two-year-old John Robert Dickinson also is charged in Allegheny County with abuse of a corpse, evidence-tampering and other crimes.

What made this assessment extra-interesting was that other courts throughout the nation, when analyzing Singer's statements on behalf of Cosby in connection with defamation lawsuits brought by other Cosby accusers, came to differing conclusions about whether denying a rape allegation and branding someone a liar could rise to an actionable statement.

In Cosby's application, his lawyer Becky James at Greenberg Gross highlights two of the embattled entertainer's successes on the defamation front.

Janice Dickinson walks through the Montgomery County Courthouse during Bill Cosby's sexual assault retrial Thursday, April 12, 2018, in Norristown, Pa. (Mark Makela/Pool Photo via AP)© The Associated Press Janice Dickinson walks through the Montgomery County Courthouse during Bill Cosby's sexual assault retrial Thursday, April 12, 2018, in Norristown, Pa. (Mark Makela/Pool Photo via AP) "The opinion places California First Amendment law in direct conflict with the decisions of two federal courts of appeal," writes James. "See McKee v. Cosby; Hill v. Cosby. Both the First and the Third Circuits held that denials by the same attorney in response to the same types of allegations against the same client are protected by the First Amendment as non-actionable opinions."

Judge Rules Trump Can Be Deposed in Defamation Lawsuit

  Judge Rules Trump Can Be Deposed in Defamation Lawsuit Summer Zervos, a former contestant on “The Apprentice," is suing President Donald Trump for defamation.President Donald Trump can be deposed in a defamation case a New York Judge ruled Tuesday.

McKee v. Cosby refers to a case brought by Katherine McKee, who says Cosby raped her in a Detroit hotel room in 1974. The dismissal of her own defamation lawsuit was upheld by the 1st Circuit, and McKee — represented by famed attorney Charles Harder —  is already asking the Supreme Court to review that case by presenting the issue as whether someone becomes a limited purpose public figure who must establish actual malice simply by stating she, too, was victimized.

Cosby hasn't yet responded to McKee's cert petition, but now the Supreme Court will have two opportunities to weigh in on defamation law as it pertains to Cosby.

Whereas McKee presents an issue for the #MeToo era, Cosby is concerned about the space that the accused have in publicly responding to allegations. The application to Justice Kennedy refers to the Supreme Court's 1990 decision in Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.

In Milkovich, then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist struggled with distinguishing opinion from fact and nodded to concerns that unduly burdensome defamation laws could stifle valuable public debate. Nevertheless, Rehnquist surprised some legal observers by writing for the majority that there was no "wholesale defamation exemption for anything that might be labeled 'opinion,'" that even an opinionated statement so long as there's something that's provably false could become grounds for a defamation claim.

Why the Summer Zervos case might be the most dangerous for Trump

  Why the Summer Zervos case might be the most dangerous for Trump It's looking more likely President Trump will have to answer questions as part of a defamation lawsuit filed by a former contestant on "The Apprentice."A ruling by a New York state judge this week said Trump can be deposed in the defamation lawsuit filed by Summer Zervos, the former contestant who has accused Trump of unwanted advances.

As Rehnquist wrote in a section in Milkovich that was picked up by Rubin in his own Cosby/Dickinson opinion, "If a speaker says, 'In my opinion John Jones is a liar,' he implies a knowledge of facts which lead to the conclusion that Jones told an untruth. Even if the speaker states the facts upon which he bases his opinion, if those facts are either incorrect or incomplete, or if his assessment of them is erroneous, the statement may still imply a false assertion of fact. Simply couching such statements in terms of opinion does not dispel these implications; and the statement, 'In my opinion Jones is a liar,' can cause as much damage to reputation as the statement, 'Jones is a liar.'

Cosby wants the Supreme Court to reassess this holding. Here's what his lawyer is now telling Kennedy:

"In the years since Milkovich was decided, lower courts have struggled with its application, often, as here, reaching conflicting outcomes as to virtually identical statements. Commentators have repeatedly noted the unworkability of the distinctions made in Milkovich between actionable and non-actionable statements of opinion. Nowhere is that unworkability more problematic than in this case, where the uncertainty in the law chills an attorney's ability to effectively represent an accused client. The Court therefore should intervene to revisit Milkovich and provide clarity as to the scope of First Amendment protection in the increasingly prevalent context of statements made in response to public accusations of misconduct."

James says she needs 30 extra days until July 12 in order to file a petition for Supreme Court review.

Related video: Bill Cosby survivor Andrea Constand recounts aftermath of assault (via TODAY)

Bill Cosby Fires Entire Legal Team As Sentencing For Guilty Verdict Looms .
EXCLUSIVE: With just over three months before his sentencing for assaulting Andrea Constand in 2004, Bill Cosby has given the boot to his entire legal team. Far from the first time that the once beloved and now much accused actor has fired his lawyers, Deadline has learned that Pennsylvania attorney Joseph P. Green Jr. has now been retained by Cosby. The well-established local lawyer takes over from the high-profile team led by Tom Mesereau. Brought on board in August 2017, the efforts of the cable news friendly ex-Michael Jackson attorney did not prevent a Norristown, PA jury from finding Cosby guilty of three counts of aggravated indecent assault in a retrial that ended o

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!