Offbeat What it means: Supreme Court strikes down PASPA law that limited sports betting

18:41  14 may  2018
18:41  14 may  2018 Source:   usatoday.com

How people reacted on Twitter to Supreme Court’s sports betting ruling: ‘It’s on now’

  How people reacted on Twitter to Supreme Court’s sports betting ruling: ‘It’s on now’ The Supreme Court's decision cleared the way for states to legalize sports betting.The justices ruled 7-2 that a 25-year-old federal law that has effectively prohibited sports betting outside Nevada by forcing states to keep prohibitions on the books is unconstitutional. The ruling could set the stage for other states to expand legalized gambling as a source of government revenue.

The Supreme Court has decided to hear New Jersey's cases for legalized sports betting . Here are the odds that each Justice votes to strike down PASPA and allow New Jersey to legally offer sports betting . Chief Justice John Roberts: -150.

The Supreme Court ’s decision in the New Jersey sports betting case will determine the future of the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act ( PASPA ), the 1992 federal law that exempts Nevada and a few other states from a blanket ban on legalized sports wagering.

Video by MSNBC

The U.S. Supreme Court ruling in favor of New Jersey on Monday effectively killed the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), the federal law that essentially limited sports betting to one state for the last 25 years.

PASPA was declared unconstitutional in the 7-2 decision, meaning it will be up to states – including New Jersey, which has sought to establish sports gambling for years – to decide whether to allow its residents to bet on sports. 

Legal sports betting coming soon to several US states

  Legal sports betting coming soon to several US states A decision by the Supreme Court means American sports fans will soon have many more places to place legal bets on the results of football, baseball, basketball, hockey and other games. Five states have the edge in the race to legalize sports betting because they've already passed laws contingent on the Supreme Court striking down the 1992 federal ban on such gambling, which the court did on Monday. And Delaware could move quickly to expand the limited legal gambling it has already. Several other states are likely to follow them in the coming months or years as they seek to capitalize on the economic growth and tax revenue that legal gambling can bring.

All bets are off: Supreme Court to review sports betting ban. Some new businesses could pop up should the Supreme Court strike down PASPA . Spreitzer said that just like anything else, the buyer should beware.

A decision that strikes down the law would "be a dam burst," said Kevin P. Braig, an Ohio lawyer who specializes in sports law . New Jersey has lost at every stage, with courts repeatedly upholding the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act ( PASPA ) of 1992.

Here’s a breakdown of what the ruling by the nation’s highest court means: 

What is PASPA? 

PASPA was signed into law by President George H.W. Bush in 1992 and went into effect in January 1993. Nevada – the only state at the time the bill became law that had widespread state-sponsored sports bettors – and three other states with more limited betting (Oregon, Delaware and Montana) were grandfathered in. 

PASPA didn’t outlaw sports betting because that was already illegal. Rather, PASPA banned states – outside those given exemptions – from regulating (and taxing) sports betting. 

Despite PASPA’s existence, the American Gaming Association (AGA) estimates at least $150 billion a year is gambled on sports in the U.S. and 97% of that amount was bet illegally. 

Why legalized sports gambling is a win for millions of fans

  Why legalized sports gambling is a win for millions of fans Supreme Court ruling strikes down federal law and puts the power to legalize sports betting in the hands of the states.Load Error

Just left Supreme Court argument on sports gambling. I will be very surprised if federal prohibition isn’t struck down . Justices Breyer and Kennedy both seemed opposed to PASPA . I think it will be 6-3, or greater, in favor of striking down PASPA .

others) probably makes it the entity investors will want to bet on if the high court strikes down the federal PASPA law . The U.S. Supreme Court decision, if it strikes down PASPA . The company naturally takes a strong issue on many grounds with the fact that the betting limit will have an impact

How soon could states offer sanctioned sports betting? 

With PASPA stricken down, states now can establish their own regulated sports betting. 

Many are expected to move quickly to establish sports betting as a means to increase their respective coffers. West Virginia Lottery general counsel Danielle Boyd told Legal Sports Report that the state – which already passed a law to authorize sports betting – could have sports betting within 90 days of PASPA's repeal. 

"That's the news every one of these states was waiting for," sports and gambling law attorney Daniel Wallach told USA TODAY Sports. "Every one of these states' legislative measures hinged on the finding of the Supreme Court that PASPA is unconstitutional. The ruling allows the states to legislate immediately and for all such laws to become effective immediately."   

PGA Tour voices support of legal sports betting in wake of Court ruling

  PGA Tour voices support of legal sports betting in wake of Court ruling PGA Tour re-asserts support for legal wagering in wake of Supreme Court ruling.PGA Commissioner Jay Moynahan had voiced his support for legal wagering on Tour events prior to the Court's ruling.

New Jersey officials appealed to the nation’s highest court urging them to overturn the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act ( PASPA ). The federal law was enacted by Congress in 1992 and limited sports betting to Nevada, Oregon, Delaware and Montana.

If the Supreme Court strikes down PASPA , a law that banned new states from legalizing sports betting , some may push for federal National gaming revenues are growing modestly, but it appears that demand for casino gambling— limited to cards, dice, and slot machines—is mostly being filled.

West Virginia is among 17 states that has passed or have bills making their way through state legislatures to legalize sports betting upon PASPA's repeal, according to the AGA. New Jersey and Mississippi are two other states Wallach said he sees moving the quickest to allow betting.  

MORE: Supreme Court strikes down ban on sports betting in victory for New Jersey

Now that it's legal, what barriers remain? 

Some of the legislation – like one proposal in Pennsylvania – requires a one-time license fee of up to $10 million, along with a tax of as much as 34% on gross receipts, something AGA senior vice president of public affairs Sara Slane told USA TODAY Sports could be a non-starter for potential operators. 

"I think their intentions are good," Slane said. "I think some states will have to go back and structure a policy that will allow operators to want to come into the state."

What do pro sports leagues stand to gain?

The NBA and MLB, seeing the potential of PASPA's repeal, have pushed the idea of a 1% sports integrity fee. (This would be taken out of all sports bets before the government gets to tax bets.) While the leagues have pitched this as a way to police point-shaving and other gambling-related corruption, Slane said it would take such a chunk that it would make legalized sports betting non-viable. 

What court's ruling on sports betting means for gamblers

  What court's ruling on sports betting means for gamblers With states such as New Jersey potentially open to take bets in time for the NBA Finals at the end of the month, here is what the ruling could mean.  Removing 'shadiness' and stigmaSports gambling has always existed. According to the American Gaming Association, at least $150 billion a year is wagered on sports, 97% of which is bet illegally through such outlets as bookies, off-shore websites and other establishments  — known as sports books — that take bets on events and pay out winnings.

16. We conclude that the 2014 Law violates PASPA because it authorizes by law sports gambling. However, PASPA does not limit its reach to active state involvement or extensive regulation of sports gambling. The Supreme Court has struck down federal laws on anti-commandeering grounds in

There’s no indication that the U.S. Supreme Court will rule on sports betting this week or in the immediate weeks ahead, but that doesn’t mean it couldn’t happen. Tags: Supreme Court , Sports Betting , PASPA . Post a Comment.

"The integrity fee is really a 20% grab on gaming revenue," Slane said. 

According to the AGA, the average sports book keeps only about 5% of the money wagered. The fee would also limit how much each state could earn in tax revenue. Nevada sports books have operated for decades without any such fee.

“The major professional sports leagues earn exorbitant profits from ticket sales, concessions, merchandise and advertising rights, and while we welcome their support for our efforts to end the failed ban on sports wagering, we do not agree that it is good policy for the leagues to take money away from law enforcement agencies that neither they nor their athletes have earned,” Chuck Canterbury, national president of the fraternal order of police, said in a statement. “Our professional leagues should focus on their sport and let us focus on enforcing the law.”

Could another federal law be on the horizon? 

One has already been proposed, although the bill hasn’t budged since it was outlined about a year ago and was introduced in December. 

Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) offered up the the Gaming Accountability and Modernization Enhancement (GAME) Act that hasn’t even been considered by a committee. There’s little chance it will get a floor vote as Congress is consumed by other issues ahead of the midterm elections. 

America is about to get more law-abiding

  America is about to get more law-abiding On sports wagering, the Supreme Court ruled for states and three principles of good government.Repeal of Prohibition in 1933 instantly reduced crime by reducing the number of criminalized activities, including some that millions of Americans considered victimless activities and none of the government’s business. Now, America is going to become more law-abiding, the Supreme Court having said that the federal government cannot prohibit states from legalizing what Americans have been doing anyway with at least 150 billion of their dollars annually.

Home : Poker News : Supreme Court To Determine Future Of Massive U.S. Sports Betting Market. Over two decades later, the Garden State wants another shot. At the time that PASPA became law , sports betting revenue in Nevada was only about 20 of the current level, and at the

With New Jersey sports betting case, Supreme Court could affect wide array of issues. Delaware, Montana and Oregon could maintain limited sports lotteries. The court could also strike the law Conversely, if the court turns New Jersey down , Congress could respond by repealing PASPA .

Part of the GAME Act is now moot, since it would have allowed states to offer legalized sports betting. But it would also mandate consumer protections, including a ban on underage betting and establish safeguards against compulsive gambling.

"I don't see Frank Pallone's bill as a relevant piece of legislation," said Wallach, a partner at Becker & Poliakoff. "There has been significant movement on the state level with no corresponding movement on the federal level. I think what we will see is a new bill coming out of one of the committees, maybe even his committee (Energy and Commerce)."

Minutes after the Supreme Court's ruling was released, Pallone used the decision to again tout the GAME Act.

"Now that the Supreme Court has struck down this unlawful and confusing law, it is time for Congress to move the GAME Act forward to ensure that consumer protections are in place in any state that decides to implement sports betting,” Pallone said in a statement. 

How soon could a new federal law be in place? 

Wallach said federal legislation – especially in a gridlocked environment on Capitol Hill –could come well after many states have already started taking bets and likely after the midterm elections. 

 "At some point, if the legislation starts to diverge from state to state and, more importantly, the leagues don't get what they want at the state level, I think you will see Congress jump into the fray and pass some kind of legislation to create more uniformity across the country," Wallach said. 

NCAA to allow championship events in states with sports gambling

  NCAA to allow championship events in states with sports gambling On the heels of the Supreme Court ruling, the NCAA said it will temporarily suspend its current policy and allow states that condone sports gambling to host championship events. In a news release Thursday morning, the NCAA announced that it is adjusting its policy in the wake of Monday's ruling to "ensure championship location continuity." The NCAA's policy had previously prevented states that allow "single-game sports wagering" from hosting championship events.The organization also clarified that Monday's decision does not change its rules prohibiting sports gambling.

The lower courts struck down the law as a violation of the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act ( PASPA ), but New Jersey was undeterred. The American Gaming Association, meanwhile, is pushing the court to strike down PASPA .

Two years after a lower court struck down the law as a violation of the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act ( PASPA ), New Jersey partially repealed the state’s prohibition on sports wagering, but only for racetracks and casinos in the state.

Follow Perez on Twitter @byajperez

How American sports betting became illegal in the first place .
Here’s why the Supreme Court couldn’t legalize gambling nationwide when it struck down a federal law. A big Supreme Court decision in May 2018 opened the door for legalized sports betting in America, but it didn’t make it legal on its own. A big Supreme Court decision in May 2018 opened the door for legalized sports betting in America, but it didn’t make it legal on its own. All the court did was wipe out a federal ban on more states permitting sports gambling.

Source: http://us.pressfrom.com/news/offbeat/-144744-what-it-means-supreme-court-strikes-down-paspa-law-that-limited-sports-betting/

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!