The page you are looking for is temporarily unavailable.
Please try again later

Offbeat Congress Should Take Back Its Power And Start Doing Its Job

17:55  14 june  2018
17:55  14 june  2018 Source:

Will Paul Ryan's retirement be a chance to change the House?

  Will Paul Ryan's retirement be a chance to change the House? A bipartisan group is urging lawmakers to seize on Speaker Paul Ryan's upcoming retirement from the House as a chance at meaningful changes.It's a recipe for upheaval, though one outside group sees a once-in-a-generation opportunity for lawmakers to overhaul their rules and put Congress on a more cooperative footing.

Russia does not want a confrontation over U.S. missiles falling on its Syrian ally. Bibi Netanyahu, after a call from Obama, is pushing Congress to back a U.S. strike on Syria. We are taking back from you the war powers the Fathers gave us.

its job with regard to sending our service men and women into battle. Last week, Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla.) saying, "This is something where Congress has collectively avoided taking responsibility for years."

Congress Should Take Back Its Power And Start Doing Its Job© The Federalist Congress Should Take Back Its Power And Start Doing Its Job

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

Procedural arguments are extraordinarily boring and completely ineffective and no one cares about them. I get it. “Process” lacks the kind of moral, cultural, or ideological appeal that animates Americans. No politician has ever won a modern election appealing to the voter’s love of neutral principles, and no one ever will.

It’s likely, in fact, that Barack Obama’s eight years have irreparably damaged process arguments. You can’t really expect the opposition party to play by the old rules once you’ve nuked them. And without fail, partisans convince themselves they’re going to be in power forever. They won’t be. The GOP won’t be either.

Gingrich says Trump pardoning himself would be "arrogant statement of power"

  Gingrich says Trump pardoning himself would be A self-pardon "would lead to a reaction in the Congress that would be devastating," former House speaker tells CBS"I don't think he can pardon himself, that would lead to a reaction in the Congress that would be devastating," Gingrich said.

While the tit-for-tat plays out, Congress should take the opportunity to reassert its constitutional authority to regulate foreign trade. Lawmakers should wrest back the constitutional authority they have abdicated. JOHANNES EISELE/AFP/Getty Images.

It ’ s nice to see the discussion going on, but the entire debate is another example of Congress delegating power and not doing its job . Ryan’s complaints about tariffs aside, he still believes in surgical action (whatever that means) against China.

So perhaps it’s better to start thinking about “norms” -- boy, that word has been ruined forever -- not as a set of cherished republican principles, but rather a practical way to crush the future dreams of your most-hated political rivals. Think of process as a deterrence.

Despite Democrats demanding that Congress limit the proper executive powers of Donald Trump, both parties can aim to reestablish checks and balances that have been piddled away over the past six decades so they can reassert their proper role in American governance.

One of those powers is trade. During a long career in Washington, Sen. James Inhofe has voted for almost every major international trade agreement, and against renewing a "fast track" presidential trade authority when Bill Clinton was in the White House. This week he blocked an amendment that would have reigned in executive power on trade. Inhofe claims it would have interfered with a defense bill. Maybe that’s the case. But it seems unlikely.

North American trio beats Morocco to host 2026 World Cup

  North American trio beats Morocco to host 2026 World Cup North America will host the 2026 World Cup after FIFA voters overwhelmingly opted for the financial and logistical certainty of a United States-led bid over a risky Moroccan proposal for the first 48-team tournament.The soccer showpiece will return to the U.S. for the first time since 1994 after gaining 134 votes, while Morocco got 65 at the FIFA Congress in Moscow on Wednesday.The vote by football federations was public, in contrast to secrecy surrounding the ballot by FIFA's elected board members for the 2018 and 2022 hosts, Russia and Qatar, in 2010.The U.S.

Congress is not trying to take its authority back from the president. Instead, our senators and congressmen are saying: “We have no plans to use our authority, but we really do not want the president doing anything with it, either.”

Congress failed to tackle this executive branch excursion into its power . Congress needs to get back in the practice of exerting its constitutional authority. This resolution addresses a bipartisan problem and should have bipartisan support.

The Constitution says Congress holds the power to "regulate Commerce with foreign Nations,” but the president is using a 1962 law that allows him to impose tariffs on things such as steel imports, because apparently making washing machines more expensive is in the national interest.

Most senators are hesitant to undermine their party’s president. Certainly this isn’t a new arrangement. But the erstwhile free traders of the GOP should imagine all the damage a progressive like Bernie Sanders could do with broad “national security” exceptions on trade.

The other power is that of treaties. If the North Korean denuclearization deal is as historic, genuine, and vital as Trump claims it will be, he has a responsibility to bring the final deal to Congress. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell says there’s “precedent” for administrations to make deals without the Senate, “but I do believe they'll need to come to Congress in some form.” The precedent he’s talking about is the Obama administration and its habit of circumventing the Constitution.

McConnell: Any North Korea deal should be submitted to Congress

  McConnell: Any North Korea deal should be submitted to Congress Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) on Tuesday said that the administration should submit any deal with North Korea to Congress. "I think there would be widespread interest in Congress for having involvement. [If] the president can reach a significant agreement with North Korea, I hope it takes the form of a treaty," McConnell told reporters.McConnell noted there was "precedent" for the administration making a deal without a treaty and what route they end up taking "will be up to them, but I do believe they'll need to come to Congress in some form.

Farm Workers Are Under Attack For Doing a Job that Other Americans Won’t. By now, through its inaction, the legislative branch has, in fact, surrendered the final remnant of authority it retained on matters relating to whether, when, against whom and for what purpose the United States should go to

Congress has done nothing. Yet Congress ’ abdication of its constitutional authority and duty to declare war did not begin with a President run amok. I propose Congress take back its power .

We were told that Obama's Paris agreement on climate was the most crucial international deal ever known to mankind -- you’ll remember the world is now in imminent peril because we exited -- yet it wasn’t important enough to be put through the traditional checks and balances of American governance. Global warming, claimed Obama at the time, “does not pause for partisan gridlock.”

The former president used the same argument for a number of his celebrated initiatives, including his creation of immigration law, of Obamacare subsidies, and of de facto international treaties. Should Trump, who can make a similar claim about gridlock -- and does -- implement his own Congress-free trade and immigration policies? If you believe tough political realities give you license to ignore process, then we can look forward to four-year intervals of perpetual governing chaos, which probably doesn’t comport with the Founders' vision for a stable nation.

Take Obama’s Iran deal, which was not only propelled by a vast number of lies, it was brittle and unsustainable because he undertook it unilaterally. These factors are all related. It’s unlikely such a deal could have survived an open debate in Congress. The Iran deal would have needed genuine consensus to pass, and it would have been placed under a scrutiny the media refused to give it.

Of course, all of this isn’t the executive branch’s fault. Congress happily abdicates its responsibility on matters of war and trade all the time. The Obama administration could use the military in Libya and Syria (where the Trump administration followed suit) without proper authorization because a pliant Congress wants no part in a contentious and politically hazardous debate over war.

But the deal with North Korea needs a debate. If the parameters are really going to end a long-simmering and dangerous conflict, Congress can both solidify the agreement for the long term and ensure that it isn’t, like the Iran deal, the executive branch empowering a tyrannical state for little in return. These actions need oversight. Without it, we will continue to see the political instability that undermines American governance.

Ukraine puts out forest fire around Chernobyl .
A forest fire that had raged for three days in the restricted zone around Chernobyl, scene of the world's worst nuclear accident in 1986, was put out Thursday and no increase in radiation in the air was detected, authorities said. "The fire in the exclusion zone was put out" in the evening, the Ukrainian emergency situations service said in a statement."Radiation levels in Kiev, Chernobyl and the power plant have not exceeded normal levels," it added.


—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!