The page you are looking for is temporarily unavailable.
Please try again later

Offbeat U.S. top court voids Minnesota ban on voter political apparel

18:07  14 june  2018
18:07  14 june  2018 Source:   reuters.com

Kelly Clarkson Thanks Carrie Underwood for Making Her ‘Feel Really Thin’ in Cute Video

  Kelly Clarkson Thanks Carrie Underwood for Making Her ‘Feel Really Thin’ in Cute Video The beloved 'Voice' coach took to Twitter on Tuesday to give a sweet shout-out to Carrie Underwood.The 36-year-old singer took to Twitter on Tuesday to detail a special delivery she received courtesy of Underwood's activewear and accessories line, CALIA.

Lawsuit challenges Minnesota 's restriction on voters wearing political messages to polling places on First Amendment grounds. Top Workplaces. Business Columnists. U . S . Supreme Court takes up Minnesota voter apparel case.

Wisconsin Elections Commission, Top 10 Things Wisconsin Voters Need to Know for the April 5 Spring Election and Presidential Preference Primary (Mar. Minnesota ’ s ban on political apparel was motivated by advancements in button technology.

Visitors walk in front of the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Tuesday, Feb. 16, 2016. © Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg Visitors walk in front of the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Tuesday, Feb. 16, 2016. States cannot completely bar people from wearing T-shirts, buttons or other apparel bearing political messages in polling sites, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Thursday in an important free speech decision striking down a Minnesota law as unconstitutional.

The court, in the 7-2 ruling, said Minnesota's law, which dates back to 1912, went too far in banning political apparel but left room for states to limit what should be allowed in polling places and what should not. The justices sent the case back down to the lower court.

Supreme Court upholds Ohio voter registration purge policy

  Supreme Court upholds Ohio voter registration purge policy The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday revived Ohio's contentious policy of purging infrequent voters from its registration rolls.Load Error

1. The Ban on “ Political ” Apparel and Statutory Context. Minnesota Election Code Chapter 211B The court concluded that a ban on apparel “expressing political ideology or beliefs, even those Reports abound of polling officials applying political apparel bans to turn away or penalize voters for

Six of the 44 cases pending at the U . S . Supreme Court are about First Amendment free speech rights. That includes Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al., v An Election Day policy said that the ban included not only campaign insignia but also issue-oriented insignia. It also included political apparel , which it

Minnesota has tried to promote voting "in a setting removed from the clamor and din of electioneering," conservative Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the opinion. "While that choice is generally worthy of our respect, Minnesota has not supported its good intentions with a law capable of reasoned application."

Roberts was joined by the other four conservatives on the court as well as liberal justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan. Liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Stephen Breyer dissented from the decision.

Delaware, Kansas, Montana, New Jersey, New York, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont and South Carolina impose restrictions similar to Minnesota's.

The Supreme Court endorsed the argument advanced by the conservative activists who challenged Minnesota's law, finding that it ran afoul of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment guarantee of freedom of speech.

The justices issued the ruling against a backdrop of deepening political polarization in America. In another major ruling involving free speech at polling sites, the high court in 1992 upheld a Tennessee law that barring the solicitation of votes and the display or distribution of campaign materials within 100 feet (30 meters) of a polling place.

(Reporting by Andrew Chung; Editing by Will Dunham)

Judge strikes down Kansas voter ID law, orders Kobach take legal classes .
A federal judge on Monday permanently struck down Kansas's proof-of-citizenship voter registration law, handing down a blistering ruling against Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, one of the country's most vocal advocates of voter-ID laws. In the 118-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Julie Robinson wrote that the state's requirement that voters show proof of citizenship during registration violated both the Constitution and the National Voter Registration Act.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!