Opinion Trump's meeting with Kim Jong Un could actually work
Trump tells Gridiron: North Korea 'called up' and 'would like to talk'
President Donald Trump said in his speech to the mostly joke-filled Gridiron Club Dinner on Saturday night that North Korea had recently reached out about possible talks. "They called up a couple of days ago and said, 'We would like to talk,'" Trump said. "And I said, 'So would we, but you have to de-nuke. You have to de-nuke.' So let's see what happens. Let's see what happens."The US has said it would be willing to meet with North Korea but has always insisted that Pyongyang eventually abandon its nuclear weapons program as part of any talks. Trump later said "maybe positive things are happening. I hope that's true. ..
Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.
In a typically bizarre sequence of events late last week, President Trump. He would be the first American president ever to meet directly with a North Korean leader.
It was a stunning development, especially after Trump spent his entire term railing theatrically against his tyrannical counterpart, threatening "fire and fury," and repeatedly contradicting his own secretary of state about how to best move forward. And the shock of his abrupt move had barely set in when Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders more or less walked back the whole initiative on Saturday by saying that "denuclearization" — the intended outcome of the negotiations —. That caveat is almost certainly a deal-breaker for the North Koreans. Yet because the only thing the president reliably sticks to is his morning Fox News briefing, no one at this point knows whether this summit will actually happen or not.
North Korea says Trump's preconditions for talks are "preposterous"
<p>North Korea says President Trump's demand that it abandon its nuclear program as a precondition to diplomatic negotiations is "preposterous," ruling out the possibility in a new statement Sunday. On Saturday, Mr. Trump addressed the possibility of negotiations with the North during an otherwise light-hearted speech at the annual Gridiron Club dinner in Washington, D.C., on Saturday night.</p>"Now we are talking and they, by the way, called up a couple of days ago. They said that, 'We would like to talk.' And I said, 'So would we, but you have to denuke, you have to denuke,"' Mr. Trump told attendees at the dinner, according to a pool report of his remarks.
Let's assume for the sake of vindictive sub-tweeting that it will. While we should be rightly skeptical that this administration possesses the policy expertise, focus, or discipline to carry off a high-stakes summit, that doesn't mean that direct, "Track 1" talks would be worthless.
First, let's bracket the obvious problems with how this process unfolded. To get a quick public relations win, Trump leapt like a cat at a laser pointer for the opportunity to meet directly with Kim, apparently without thinking through the parameters of the discussion, what the U.S. and its allies in East Asia want to achieve and what they are willing to concede, or how other countries — like China — might react to such a dramatic about-face in the U.S. negotiating position. Basically, he agreed to board a plane without knowing the destination or fare.
Trump and Kim: Where will they meet and what will they say?
Very little is known about US President Donald Trump's plans to meet North Korean leader Kim Jong Un except that the historic moment will happen before May. It's a seismic shift in a relationship that until now has been based on repeated taunts between two leaders who last year brought the world to the brink of nuclear war.North Korea experts said they haven't got high hopes for the unprecedented meeting, which will be the first between a sitting US President and North Korean leader. Former US Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton each met members of the ruling Kim family, but only after they'd left office.
To make matters worse, Trump will be badly hampered by his deliberate failure to properly staff the State Department — where the U.S. currently, an undersecretary for arms control and international security, that are usually in place by this point in an administration. These diplomats and their (similarly non-existent) underlings are crucial interlocutors in any set of complex negotiations, and they must be reinforced with area experts on North Korean and East Asian affairs who actually know what they're talking about. Do such exotic creatures even exist in a Trump menagerie that few reputable foreign policy veterans will agree to join and that doesn't even bother to hide its contempt for expertise?
Furthermore, unlike most presidents, Trump also lacks a trusted diplomat in the role of secretary of state, after appointing oil executive Rex Tillerson to the post and sidelining him repeatedly in a series of ritualistic public humiliations. It is almost impossible to imagine the gruff and detached Tillerson, a man who always looks like he just woke up from a dream about going to the dentist, capably babysitting the president during what will likely be the most massive international news story of the year, especially since Tillerson was incapable, in October, of convincingly denying that he
Trump: Without me 'Olympics would have been a total failure'
President Trump took credit for the success of the 2018 Winter Olympic Games in South Korea at a rally in Pennsylvania on Saturday. During a campaign rally for state Rep. Rick Saccone (R), who is running for Congress, Trump also took credit for a lessened threat of nuclear attack surrounding the games."I'll tell you, we did a great job on the Olympics," Trump said. "President Moon of South Korea said without Donald Trump the Olymp ics would have been a total failure.""It's a little hard to sell tickets when you think you are going to be nuked," he added.
But many conservativesfor another reason: They believe North Korea can't be trusted to stick to a deal at all, after the disastrous implosion of the , signed in 1994 by the Clinton administration and aimed at stemming the country's nuclear weapons development. Many contemporary conservatives don't believe in nuclear diplomacy full-stop, a stubborn position that intentionally misunderstands and misrepresents the long and successful history of negotiations to prevent nuclear proliferation, most recently with Iran. Others have for giving North Korea's bizarre leader what he wants and craves — recognition and equal standing with America.
God strike me down for saying these words, but Trump should be applauded for telling these dour warmongers to stuff it. If giving Kim Jong Un an ego boost is all it takes to resolve this terrifying crisis, it should have been done ages ago.
So while the president may be the last person you want seated across the table from Kim, his instincts, for once, are correct: The only way out of this crisis is through negotiations in which each side gives up something of real value. While critics like to point to the failure of the Agreed Framework as definitive proof that deals with iron-fisted tyrants can't be forged, the history of nuclear diplomacy says otherwise.
Kim Jong Un Wants a Peace Treaty From Trump, Report Says
Kim Jong Un wants to sign a peace treaty after meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump, South Korean media reported, reviving a long-held goal of the North Korean regime. Kim is likely to raise the possibility of a peace treaty, along with establishing diplomatic relations and nuclear disarmament, during a meeting with the U.S. leader, the Dong-A Ilbo newspaper said Monday, citing an unidentified senior official in South Korea’s presidential office. Trump last week agreed to meet Kim, although key details of the summit have yet to be decided.
The U.S. negotiated multiple agreements with the Soviet Union, whose leaders had engaged in far more comprehensive subterfuge than North Korea. Not only did the USSR build its first atomic bomb with the help of stolen blueprints transferred via Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, but Moscow also furtively placed nuclear missiles in Cuba in 1961, triggering the most serious nuclear crisis the world has yet witnessed. Yet despite this history of mistrust, American and Soviet leaders got to workbeginning in the 1970s that have successfully reduced global stockpiles from to .
America's defense hawks were incredibly hostile to these agreements when they were being negotiated, even when the president was a Republican. Yet those agreements have been remarkably effective, and have been deepened by a series of subsequent deals with the Russian Federation. The trust-building embedded in those incremental agreements also helped when it came time to. Despite the deterioration of relations between Washington and Moscow, neither side has moved to blow past agreed-upon warhead limits.
North Korean Foreign Minister headed to Sweden
North Korea's foreign minister is visiting Sweden Thursday and Friday, the Swedish government announced, in the first significant diplomatic move by Pyongyang since a momentous summit with the US was announced a week ago. Sweden has been floated as a possible venue for the summit between North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and United States President Donald Trump. Sweden's embassy in Pyongyang represents US interests in the country.
It's also not the case that there is no imaginable scenario short of war in which North Korea gives up its nukes altogether. Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstanthey inherited with the collapse of the USSR. South Africa, which had built a handful of nuclear weapons in the 1980s, when the apartheid regime was in its final days. And countries like Libya and Iran have agreed to either abandon or truncate their nuclear programs in return for economic incentives or security guarantees. The Iranian agreement, in particular, was negotiated despite very real mutual resentment and distrust and a recent history of breakdown.
The failure of the security promises made to Ukraine (), and the fate of the Libyan regime ( shortly after abandoning its nuclear program) are actually bigger stumbling blocks to a deal than any past behavior of the North Koreans. Even if we could convince the regime to pursue full denuclearization, will they believe any promises made about security given this history? If not, does the U.S. have any bright new ideas about how to build the kind of trust necessary to conclude a deal? Is the U.S. willing to provide credible security commitments to a government with one of the worst human rights records on the planet?
It is precisely these questions that the Trump administration either lacks answers to or has not even begun to ask. That's what makes the president's apparent determination to hop a flight to Pyongyang with his "" bluster and his total lack of any comprehensible plan so worrisome. But if he can find the time in, between filing lawsuits against porn stars and filling the vacancy-of-the-week precipitated by the total chaos inside the White House, the president can still slow things down, staff up his foreign policy team, convene the relevant stakeholders, and try to show up in Pyongyang prepped, briefed, and ready to negotiate.
But don't hold your breath.
North Korea's Kim Jong Un Could Attack Europe .
North Korea has said it must continue its nuclear weapons program to deter the United States or other enemies from invading or striking the isolated nation. Washington has 28,500 troops deployed in South Korea.South Korean President Moon Jae-in spoke with Trump on the phone Friday and both voiced “cautious optimism” about working together to curb North Korea’s nuclear weapons. "A brighter future is available for North Korea, if it chooses the correct path,” a White House statement said.
Donald Trump Excited to Meet Kim Jong-un
South Korean officials delivered a letter today from North Korea's Kim Jong-un to Donald Trump inviting him to meet and promising to halt missile tests. North Korea also announced that their...
How Can President Donald Trump Prepare For A Meeting With Kim Jong Un? | MSNBC
Adam Mount, Senior Fellow at the Federation of American Scientists, discusses North Korea and how to prepare for a meeting between President Trump and Kim Jong Un. » Subscribe to MSNBC: http://on...
Tuesday, 19 june 2018
In March of 2017, then-Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly spoke with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer about a possible new initiative separating children from their parents at the border. “I would do almost anything to deter the people from Central America from getting on this very, very dangerous […]
Tuesday, 19 june 2018
The greatest tragedy of the immigration debate is that despite the acrimony surrounding it, it’s arguably the policy most easily fixed.Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or […]
Wednesday, 20 june 2018
They’re trapped between an obsequious GOP majority and a hysterical progressive cacophony.Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or […]
Tuesday, 19 june 2018
Anushay Hossain writes that Ivanka Trump must use her platform to advocate for children being forcibly separated from their parents thanks to the Trump administration's policy of zero tolerance.Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content […]
Tuesday, 19 june 2018
Coverage of illegal-immigration issues has always been shot through with emotionally manipulative falsehood.The illegal-immigration issue has always been one fraught with politicking. We always hear the same refrain from both sides: that people are suffering and living in the shadows; […]